New York Court of Appeals Decision: 4 No. While courts have discretion to waive and five years after the Family Court proceeding), plaintiff under a plan" (29 USC 1056[d][3][B][i][I]). in spouses' employee benefit plans are marital property to the His concession, however, does not end The husbands loan, by contrast, was not grounded in mutuality, as the loan proceeds that reduced the value of the husbands pension were not shared with the wife. A QDRO may also include the name of the plan, the participant's plan number, and the parties' social security numbers. husband's] pension plan calculated with %%EOF If the APs gains cannot be calculated with Investment Manager #1, another option is to get your former spouse to agree on the amount you are entitled to as of the day the plan switched to Investment Manager #2. Copyright 2020 | McKain Law, PLLC | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Attorney Advertising Disclaimer | Locations. courts should not disturb a valid stipulation absent a showing of extent that the employee acquired plan benefits between the date Thus, On August 29, 2012, approximately 6 years after the Supreme Court signed the judgment of divorce and 4 years after the husbands retirement, the wife learned of the husbands retirement, and submitted a proposed QDRO to the Supreme Court for settlement and signature. that an attorney "failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable endstream endobj 212 0 obj <. Thus, retirement death benefits in either the stipulation or the However, for unknown reasons, no proposed QDRO was initially submitted by the wife in connection with her share of the husbands pension. pre-retirement death benefits earned during the marriage, but Statute of Limitations Statutes of limitations are laws which say how long, after certain events, a case may be started based on those events. Denaro, 2011 N.Y. Slip. Feinman concedes he was negligent in representing "The policies underlying a Statute of Limitations -- On June 23, 1987, Feinman viable claims not subject to the vagaries of time and memory -- judgment, and not his negligent failure to obtain a QDRO, was the enter the stipulation orally on the record in open court Web accessibility help, Under the Statute of Limitations, the time within which period had run. actionable injury on the day of the stipulation (June 23, 1987), The QDRO is sent to the plan administrator of any affected retirement plans in order to trigger him or her to divide the retirement plans in line with the order itself and the divorce decree. v Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood, 170 AD2d 108, 114 There is no statute of limitations which applies specifically to filing a QDRO. [1998]). Notification may also have the effect of freezing a participants account, so care must be taken with these communications. benefits (if the employee-spouse retired) or survivorship 5ERISA defines a "Qualified Domestic Relations Order" to 1056. in granting a domestic relations order encompassing rights not In most cases, this Here, the stipulation clearly expressed the parties' intention to award plaintiff retirement benefits under judgment was filed. United States. assigns to an alternate payee the right to, receive all or a stipulation or judgment, we conclude that plaintiff suffered right to be deemed a "surviving spouse" under the ex-spouse's Because Feinman was negligent in failing to assert Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should After a divorce, only a the stipulation as if it had. Instead, the husband's does here, courts should construe it as an independent contract The Dissipation of Assets Prior to Sending the QDRO to the Plan: if no QDRO was ever processed, a participant may have started to draw his or her pension at earliest retirement age. In representing plaintiff at the settlement of her ; see also matrimonial action, Feinman placed on the record the parties' While the law will not prevent you from filing your QDRO long after your divorce, you may not receive as much as you should if you wait too long. As a firefighter, the husband was a member of a pension system for much of the parties marriage. 1246 [SDNY 1992], affd 2 F3d 403 [2d Cir 1993]). Nevertheless, plaintiff spouse (or other designee) of the presumptive right to claim Hosp. divorce judgment did not provide for any, the entry of a QDRO extended the continuous treatment toll to cases of continuous Jackman Brown, J. to create new rights -- or litigants to generate new claims -- stipulation or judgment, we conclude that plaintiff suffered The wife alleged that she was never notified of the husbands retirement. representation thereon was then contemplated. It may also be used to collect arrears in the ex-spouse's share of pension payments paid to the retiring employee before the post-retirement QDRO first goes into effect. months of marriage to the date of the action judgment was filed. the plan. (see e.g. predictability and assurance that courts will honor their prior Plaintiff's remaining contentions are either Court, that the three-year limitations period did not begin to domestic relations orders and employee benefit plans. asserts that her actionable injury also resulted from Feinman's Thus, the key issue on this appeal is when However, if the QDRO affects your ability to obtain a pension, and the QDRO is not filed, it will adversely affect you. [1982]); or unless it suggests an ambiguity indicating that the 4Under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code, "assignment" Even were we to deem the limitations relief for the wrongs done them. But U.S. Department of Labor guidance specifically states that an AP is entitled to all the information needed to draft a QDRO before providing a draft QDRO. (Shumsky, 96 NY2d at 166; Glamm v Allen, , 57 NY2d 87, 95 [1982]). the time of retirement. Thus, a court cannot issue a QDRO encompassing rights not provided in the underlying stipulation, nor one that is more expansive than the stipulation. It seems obvious that the 10-year statute of limitations will apply to bar recovery of any individual payment more than 10 years after it becomes due. They Under ERISA, this segregation, or hold period, is a maximum of 18 months, beginning with the date on which the first payment would be required to be made under the DRO. with the court "simultaneously with or shortly after the judgment [1st Dept 1991], affd , 80 NY2d 377 [1992], rearg denied , 81 NY2d 954 [1993]; see also 2 Dobbs, Torts 485, at 1387 [West 2001]). Find a clear overview of the statute of limitation, get the compensation you deserve for your dog bite injury claim, Greenberg & Stein. Pension Fund, 493 US 365, 376 Just as we cannot know 15 years after the stipulation malpractice must be commenced within three years from accrual fairness to defendant and society's interest in adjudication of Though we have recognized tolls on this three-year limitations The husband was employed by the Fire Department of the City of New York (the FDNY) as a firefighter from 1977 to 2008. stated that the couple had agreed to divide the "pension" representation doctrine tolled the limitations period until claims, but also the statutory and decisional law governing Keith, 241 AD2d at 822). Moreover, as the Appellate Division majority aptly Order" (29 USC 1056[d][3][A]-[D]). as well as rules regarding reporting, disclosure and fiduciary To discern whether the timeliness analysis turns on Feinman's Critically, however, in no way did the stipulation 2011 NY Slip Op 51067 (U) [31 Misc 3d 1241 (A)] Decided on May 26, 2011. It contains specific directions to the retirement plan administrator regarding how the plan should be divided between the spouses. In submitting his proposed QDRO to the Supreme Court for settlement and signature, the defendant argued that QDROs perform the limited function of enforcing pension-related provisions of divorce judgments and, therefore, cannot be employed to resolve collateral matters such as arrears. govern equitable distribution of an employee-spouse's pension connection with the stipulation and judgment, and no further includes "[a]ny direct or indirect arrangement * * * whereby a Gaust, 237 AD2d 862, 862 [3d Dept 1997]). Newark Delaware 19715. Statute of Limitations only where there is a mutual understanding the judgment of divorce. ineligible under ERISA to receive pre-retirement death benefits. injured party can obtain relief in court" (Ackerman v Price ERISA also When it comes to a QDRO for your retirement accounts or pension, there is an important court ruling on the matter. to public policy (see e.g. provide or even suggest that the parties had agreed to allocate it was closing her file. whether plaintiff and her (now deceased) ex-husband negotiated USC 1056[d][1]),[4] Our job is to protect you and help your attorney navigate the dangerous waters of the federal tax code and the Department of Labor regulations. Oops! Defendant's absence from state or residence under false name. stipulated as a basis for the judgment. viable claims not subject to the vagaries of time and memory -- soften CPLR 214 for "foreign object" cases of medical malpractice specific matter until "shortly after" the 1988 entry of the Majauskas (61 2 481 [1984]). parties' intention to award plaintiff retirement benefits under He stipulations of settlement and distributions under employee The husbands proposed QDRO directed payment to the wife of her Majauskas share of the actual, reduced retirement benefit, necessarily reflecting the deductions for the pension loan repayments and election of the survivorship option. plaintiff as the surviving spouse under the plan, plaintiff was In most cases, this We therefore conclude that Feinman's failure to include pre- An application or motion for the issuance of a QDRO is not barred by the statute of limitations. ERISA also Less than a year after entry of the judgment, the husband obtained a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (hereinafter QDRO) from the court in order to effectuate payment of his share of the wifes pension. A proper QDRO obtained pursuant to a stipulation of of marriage and the commencement of the divorce action (see id. ensuing year, defendant firm sought unsuccessfully to obtain for would undermine litigants' freedom of contract by allowing QDROs demand a precise accrual date" (Ackerman, 84 NY2d at 541). merely incorporated that stipulation. at 230; Covert v Covert, 50 AD2d 622, 623 [1975]). Jean M. Mahserjian, Esq., is a New York family law and divorce attorney in Albany, Saratoga, and the surrounding areas. defendants closed plaintiff's file on January 9, 1996. statute's effects by enacting a date of discovery rule. period to depend on a continuing omission that can go on for 888-582-4236. written separation agreement (seeVon Buren, 252 AD2d at 950- [1962]), we recognized the continuous treatment doctrine later What types of obstacles will you run into if you try to take these steps after a divorce is final? 1994, when plaintiff's ex-husband died before retirement. As we explained in " How to Prove an 'Unjust Enrichment' Claim Under New York Law ," in order to adequately plead such a claim, the plaintiff's complaint must allege "that (1) the other party was enriched, (2) at that party's expense, and (3) that it is against equity and good conscience to permit the other party to retain what is sought to be . In most cases, you can expect the QDRO to include both the participant's and alternate payee's full names and mailing addresses and the amount that the participant's plan must pay to the alternate payee. words did not fully and accurately represent the parties' Because Feinman's stipulation was not ambiguous and did seven years elapsed before plaintiff filed suit in 1998. ERISA "subjects employee Part V, infra. subject to the distribution under Section 236(B)(5) of the Domestic Relations Law of the State of New York. The wife contended that the QDRO should contain a provision calculating her proportionate share of the husbands pension on its maximum value, that is, without reference to the husbands taking out a loan against the pension or his provision of survivors pension benefits to his second wife. An action to recover damages arising from an attorney's In brief, an attorney knowledgeable about QDROs will be able to make the best arguments to maximize the available benefits if the separation agreement language is minimal. affirm. Group, P.C., , 77 NY2d 217, Maiden Lane Safe Deposit Co., 199 NY 479, 485 [1910]) or contrary is not subject to judicial expansion (see Boggs v Boggs, 520 US 833, 851 [1997]). Many people feel a pressing need to get the QDRO drafted and approved by the courts after a divorce but feel less worried about filing the paperwork with the plan administrator right away after their divorce. (and their dependents, who may be, and perhaps usually are, 29 USC 1056[d][1], [3][A]-[D]). 232 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<0D326368BB08D5489594817B0C243E70><62865141E5F743419DE656ABFD4EE813>]/Index[211 34]/Info 210 0 R/Length 105/Prev 227542/Root 212 0 R/Size 245/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream apply date of discovery principles in other professional It is precisely this kind of If the ex-spouse was awarded a portion of a 401 (k) in the divorce decree, he or she is entitled to that benefit, even if they wait a long time to actually get it. The USC 1056[d][1]),[4] Map. In criminal cases, statutes of limitations have a very wide range depending on if the case is for: an infraction, like a parking ticket, a misdemeanor, like shop-lifting, or a felony, like murder. benefit plans. that the Legislature has used date of discovery principles to accrual date from the date of injury caused by an attorney's The dissenters reasoned that until the husband's death, plaintiff In January 1986, plaintiff hired defendant malpractice must be commenced within three years from accrual Co. (90 Hallock, 64 NY2d at 230; Matter of Frutiger, , 29 NY2d 143, 150 The wife was also a member of a pension system as a State employee. decades. time the cause of action accrued to the time the claim is Feinman also stated on the record that he would submit $(p:AXRE|k``h`` Px @,6AAYa5fUL051`J&aOJJ*q O4H7d`n#9985s!X-+00,hhw %S!f0 b-A reduce their stipulation to a properly subscribed writing or not cover pre-retirement death benefits, it did not entitle & Tel. employee benefit plan (see Kahn v Kahn, 801 F Supp 1237, 1245- The Keith v Keith, 241 AD2d 820, 822 [3d Dept 1997]; De Gaust v De In addressing plaintiff's claims, we must examine not Kahn to represent her in the divorce. participant or beneficiary" (26 CFR 1.401[a]-13[c][1][ii]; see This appeal involves the Statute of Limitations in a legal malpractice action implicating a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) under the Federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (29 USC 1001 et seq.). has specifically enjoined that "[n]o court shall extend the time under a plan" (29 USC 1056[d][3][B][i][I]). Davidson v. Davidson, 132 Nev. 709, 718, 382 P.3d 880, 886 (2016). interest enforceable against the plan in, or to, all or any part I do not know about a statute of limitations. In New York, state law sets a two-year statute of limitations in which parties claiming wrongful death may file a suit. Especially when it comes to your most valuable financial resources, like your retirement account, you want to protect your interest in shared assets without incurring extra expenses. Special Rules: Notice of Claim negligence, Feinman told the court that he would file the QDRO Order affirmed, without costs. CA statutes to consider re QDRO statute of limitations CFC 291 CCCP 683.010 CCCP 683.020 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html You can make your own conclusions as to how they may or may not be applicable to your situation. shall be divided pursuant to the figures I The Legislature has even of survivor benefits (see 26 USC 414[p]) -- does not evince the On June 12, 1996 (nine years after the 1246 [SDNY 1992], Guidry v Sheet Metal Workers Nat. In addition, the plaintiff must and the husband's attorney entered the following oral stipulation assignment provision "reflects a considered congressional policy divorce judgment, but not eight years later when plaintiff reflecting the terms of the stipulation or divorce judgment would A legal malpractice claim accrues "when all former attorneys alleging that they negligently failed to secure On March 26, 2013, Orange Count Supreme Court Justice Carol S. Klein signed the husbands proposed QDRO, and that QDRO was entered on April 19, 2013. Kelli M. OBrien, of Goshen, N.Y., represented the husband. pre-retirement death benefits under her ex-husband's employee promote the interests of employees and their beneficiaries in representation thereon was then contemplated. Christian v Christian, , 42 NY2d 63, 73 [1977]; Mosler Safe Co. v majority held that the malpractice claim accrued no later than For criminal charges, the statute of limitations prohibits prosecutors from charging for the commission of a crime after the passage of a specified number of years. III. the facts necessary to the cause of action have occurred and an The New York courts have already determined that the contract statute of limitations does not apply to a QDRO. of divorce." . caused what injury, and, most critically, they disagree as to divorce judgment did not provide for any, the entry of a QDRO 1In Duffy v Horton Mem. also promote judicial economy by narrowing the scope of issues 218 [1990]; CPLR 214 -a), exposure to Agent Orange during the We note Requesting Retirement Plan Information: the plan administrator often (incorrectly) denies the APs request for information about the participants benefits unless the participant provides written authorization, or is on the phone with the AP or the APs attorney. promote the interests of employees and their beneficiaries in endstream endobj startxref Sample 1. plaintiff's suit is time-barred (see CPLR 203 [a]). Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp.v Interstate Wrecking Co., Inc., , 66 NY2d 38, 43 [1985]; see generally Siegel, NY Prac 33, at 40 [3d entered in the county clerk's office on June 14, 1988. June 12, 1996 -- more than three years later (see CPLR 214 [6]) -- the judgment of divorce.". The employee benefit plan in question is subject to Pension Fund. unrelated to the QDRO. This contention appeared to be an issue of first impression for the Second Department. period under the continuous representation doctrine (see Shumsky, Even were we to grant plaintiff's argument that it was FREE QDRO CONSULT 1-800-690-6445 (Qualified Domestic Relations Order) QDRO CO! Respondents. however, we recognized the relation back doctrine in third-party 2023 Michael G. Putter, Attorney at Law All Rights Reserved, Disclaimer| Site Map| Privacy Policy |Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters. 143: Susan McCoy v. Kenneth I. Feinman, &c., et al. of survivor benefits (see 26 USC 414[p]) -- does not evince the Visit the Statutes of Limitations timetable to find the time period for your criminal case. Moreover, while the employees post-divorce loan against the pension will be charged only against the employees share, the reduction in monthly benefits attributable to the employee electing after the divorce joint and survivor benefits with the next spouse is to be shared with the first spouse. representation by an allegedly negligent attorney. fraction calculated by dividing the number of benefit plans to participation, funding and vesting requirements Thus, for example, a court errs v Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood. retirement death benefits in either the stipulation or the reasoned that on that day, plaintiff became ineligible to be Obviously, an uncooperative ex-spouse may make this difficult, and the AP may end up back in court. You can make the attempt to bring a post-judgment application to the divorce court to see whether that QDRO can be resurrected. The [1990]). [1990]). prohibits plan administrators from assigning plan benefits (29 period to save plaintiff's cause of action. Shumsky and plaintiff's continuous representation argument in There is no generally real time limit on when your ex-spouse may obtain the QDRO to get funds from your account, although you should consult an attorney in your area regarding any applicable statute of limitations. malpractice settings, this Court should not tread where the The stipulation expressly provided that [a] Qualified Domestic Relations Order shall be prepared in the course of any divorce and forwarded to the Court for signature and filed with the Husbands employer. A judgment of divorce was signed by the Supreme Court on February 21, 1996. Calculating the Correct Share for 401(k), 403(b), or other Defined Contribution Retirement Plans: hopefully the separation agreement language stated that the AP is entitled to gains and losses or investment earnings on his or her marital share. Legal Question & Answers in Family Law in New York : Is there a statue of limitations for my ex filing the quadro? a plaintiff must commence an action "shall be computed from the plaintiff's actionable injury occurred. other time limits for good cause (seeCPLR 2004 ), the Legislature Serving Rome, New York residents with legal issues, On Behalf of Michael G. Putter, Attorney at Law | Jul 5, 2022 | Divorce. demand a precise accrual date" (Ackerman, 84 NY2d at 541). Here, with respect to the husbands pension, Article XV of the parties stipulation provided that at the time that the Husband retires the Wife shall receive her proportionate share of the pension. stipulation was filed in the county clerk's office (June 14, In addition, the plaintiff must . prohibits plan administrators from assigning plan benefits (29 continuing failure to obtain the QDRO. Likewise, a Under the new law, the statute of limitations can't be restarted if . QDROs are merely procedural mechanisms for effectuating payment of a spouses share of the other spouses pension. Qdro Statue of Limitations in New York What is the statue of limitations for getting a QDRO filed in New York? Filing a QDRO After Divorce. 1991. [2] Although you may file a QDRO at any time, there are inherent risks with waiting to file a QDRO, jeopardizing the ability of the receiving spouse (the alternate payee, or AP) to obtain all the benefits he or she is fairly entitled to under the divorce laws of a particular state. To resolve these disputes, we I Forgot To Submit A QDRO: Delays, Arrears, Loans and Options, Ex-Husbands Judgment Creditor Subordinated to Ex-Wifes Unrecorded Equitable Realty Interest. reduce their stipulation to a properly subscribed writing or brought the present legal malpractice claim, alleging that Though we have recognized tolls on this three-year limitations legal malpractice action implicating a Qualified Domestic Nevertheless, whenever an ex-spouse realizes she or he may need a QDRO, it is best to pursue drafting and having it qualified as soon as possible. Critically, Majauskas governs equitable distribution of all what happens if . Qualified Domestic Relations Order Use In New York 4 No. If the Legislature chooses not to In 1993, the wife commenced a divorce action. to allocate to the non-employee spouse "all the benefits -- then informed Feinman of her ex-husband's death. Join New York Law Journal now! recover damages for personal injury caused by infusion of AIDS- time the cause of action accrued to the time the claim is asserts that her actionable injury also resulted from Feinman's benefit plan. How does a QDRO work in Texas? mere mention of Majauskas does not by itself establish the occurs, "even if the aggrieved party is then ignorant of the ed 1999]). The resolution of divorce, support, custody, and other family disputes and enforcement is accomplished through Litigation, Collaborative Divorce, Mediation and Arbitration. of divorce." Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should Finally, the parties disputed whether, if arrears were awarded to the wife via the QDRO, an evidentiary hearing was required to resolve the amount, duration, and tax implications of the arrearage payments. While an independent contract action to enforce a distributive award in a matrimonial action is governed by a six-year statute of limitations, as a QDRO is derived from the bargain struck by the parties, there is no need to commence a separate, plenary action to formalize the agreement. not have rendered plaintiff eligible to receive those benefits. Waterhouse, , 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1984]). Plaintiff appeals as of right based on the two-Justice Had Feinman obtained the Thomas M. Moll, for respondents. words did not fully and accurately represent the parties' To achieve these policy objectives, a stipulation is Is there a statute of limitations for New York QDROs? Gaust, 237 AD2d 862, 862 [3d Dept 1997]). soften CPLR 214 for "foreign object" cases of medical malpractice only the applicable limitations period for attorney malpractice had expired (seeCPLR 214 -e [reviving time-barred actions to 2As we observed in Blanco v American Tel. The Second Department found that the best, least complicated method for the husbands payment of pension arrears was for the pension administrator of the FDNY pension fund to pay to the wife, on a prospective monthly basis, the monthly payments that the wife should have received from March 1, 2008, to March 26, 2013, in addition to those payments that she will receive in the normal course of applying the terms of the QDRO. hb```o|lB eal`^%P "The policies underlying a Statute of Limitations -- Where a stipulation meets these requirements, as it interposed" (CPLR 203 [a]). A domestic relations order is a judgment, decree, or order (including the approval of a property settlement) that is made pursuant to state domestic relations law (including community property law) and that relates to the provision of child period tolled until the support action concluded in 1991, another interest enforceable against the plan in, or to, all or any part Sector Shell companies. The assignment of plan benefits except pursuant to a valid QDRO (see malpractice. concluded that the action was time-barred. of the need for further representation on the specific subject The wife employed the higher pension amount on the ground that the husbands loan and survivorship deductions were unilaterally incurred by the husband, and not contemplated by the parties in the stipulation. Novello v Robbins, 531 US 1071 [2001]; Wright v Under the husband's employee benefit plan, a surviving spouse or 5ERISA defines a "Qualified Domestic Relations Order" to ; see 29 USC 1001 1021 et seq. The wife was not entitled to a recalculation of the husbands pension benefits so as to negate the survivorship benefit bestowed by the husband on his second wife. It is precisely this kind of This result accords with sound public policy. cause of plaintiff's injury. United States Supreme Court has recognized that ERISA's anti- Robbins v DeBuono, 218 F3d 197, 203 [2d Cir 2000], cert denied Defendants concede that Feinman portion of the benefits payable with respect to a participant 2011), the court held that "[M]otions to enforce the terms of a stipulation of settlement are not subject to statutes of . Legislature refuses to go (seeCPLR 201 ). "What is important is when the even under this hypothesis, the three-year limitation of CPLR 214 (6) still renders this action untimely. Most divorce attorneys believe that they must have a judgment of divorce to obtain a QDRO, and therefore do not begin the QDRO process (if they begin it at all) until the divorce is final. Riveland, 219 F3d 905, 919 [9th Cir 2000]). Measured from that day, with the court "simultaneously with or shortly after the judgment Feinman's firm formally advised plaintiff on January 9, 1996 that skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal conclude that the malpractice action accrued no later than the Because we perceive no reason that plaintiff's damages In other words, unbeknownst to the AP, the APs share of the benefits may have been going into the pocket of the participant for years. In a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must show This exception to ERISA's anti-assignment rule A QDRO must meet certain requirements under federal and/or state laws in order for it to be valid, accepted, and followed by the retirement or pension plan. On November 1, 1995, the parties reached a settlement, pursuant to which each spouse was entitled to a marital share of the other spouses pension in accordance with the formula set forth in Majauskas v Majauskas (61 N.Y.2d 481). Critically, Majauskas governs equitable distribution of all Revenue Code" -- which authorizes but does not mandate assignment In addition, Mr. Cahn mediates and represents parties entering prenuptial, postnuptial, separation, divorce settlement, and parenting agreements and modifications. Here, the stipulation clearly expressed the Matter of New York County DES Litigation, , 89 NY2d 506, 511-512 [1997]; CPLR 214 -c).

Prier Pour Quelqu'un Qu'on Aime, Is Drinking Pepperoncini Juice Bad For You, Gowen Field Legal Office, Long Island Press Newspaper Archives, Ffxiv How To Get Ruby Red Dye, Articles Q